Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. It is for this reason that a good number of people have been patiently waiting for this ruling to see if corporates will be given the room to donate in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. You will get to understand more about this particular ruling as you keep on reading.
You need to keep in mind that there was basically nothing strange that happened in the court today. The Supreme Court simply chose to not to consider the challenges to the current campaign finance laws. This means that corporates will not be allowed to donate any money to both campaigns and candidates. This decision has resulted in curtailing the ballooning role of corporates in the political field. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would have been allowed in case the money was not directly associated to particular individuals. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. The aim of this case was to make sure that a boost in financial responsibility and even economic opportunities is enriched. It will actually be more prudent for you to consider a good lawyer in case of such a big case.
You need to be made conversant with the legal arguments that this case was premised on. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. You will find that non-profit as well as charity organizations are barely given the room to donate to these political campaigns. This means that they are treated differently from corporate entities. This certainly goes against what the dictates of the constitution are.
It is imperative to mention that what the high court ruled was still favored. This ruling indicated that corporates are not given the room to contribute to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. It is for this reason that no political candidate will be at liberty to receive any donation from corporations.